{"id":11330,"date":"2022-04-22T10:00:00","date_gmt":"2022-04-22T17:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.procore.com\/jobsite\/?p=11330"},"modified":"2022-04-22T15:32:01","modified_gmt":"2022-04-22T22:32:01","slug":"the-critical-role-contractors-play-in-sustainable-infrastructure","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.procore.com/jobsite\/the-critical-role-contractors-play-in-sustainable-infrastructure","title":{"rendered":"The Critical Role Contractors Play in Sustainable Infrastructure"},"content":{"rendered":"
When<\/span> historic flooding destroyed bridges, dams and levees and washed out 42 wastewater treatment plants in the midwest, the heart of the nation felt the sting of an ongoing infrastructure challenge. More frequent and stronger weather events threaten infrastructure sustainability, forcing public budgets into cycles of repair and rebuild. <\/span><\/p>\n Contractors are on the leading edge of this challenge, tasked with providing sustainable solutions that don\u2019t break the bank. Not surprisingly, research shows there is a big return on investment when infrastructure projects get built to a standard higher than many existing codes. However, it\u2019s not about over-building, but smarter building.<\/span><\/p>\n Smart Investments = Create Big Returns<\/b><\/p>\n There is a lot at stake for public entities in stemming the total effects of severe weather on public investments. An independent<\/span> study<\/span><\/a> found that for every $3.5 billion spent mitigating the consequences of hurricanes, floods, and earthquakes, society would save $14 billion. <\/span><\/p>\n In the recent follow-up study, Natural Hazard Mitigation:<\/span> 2018 Interim Report<\/span><\/a>, the rewards of federal mitigation program grants returned a benefit of six dollars for every dollar invested. Meanwhile, adopting model codes for new construction returned a benefit of four dollars for every dollar invested. Research proves communities that consistently met newer codes improved infrastructure resilience.<\/span><\/p>\n Research proves communities that consistently met newer codes improved infrastructure resilience. They also added 30,000 jobs to the construction materials industry as well as <\/span>increased domestic construction material<\/span><\/a> use for each year of new construction. Even though public funding to mitigate natural hazards has dropped in recent years, contractors who understand the problems and solutions to infrastructure sustainability can still find opportunities in this market.<\/span><\/p>\n Build It Once<\/b><\/p>\n It\u2019s obviously much cheaper to build a wastewater treatment facility or a bridge sustainably and then simply watch while it lasts through multiple extreme weather events. Especially, if it doesn\u2019t necessitate repairing and rebuilding afterwards. And, exceeding the minimum code requirements for new public construction can often make a big difference in sustainability. <\/span><\/p>\n What about the already existing public infrastructure, though? What\u2019s possible in changing the outcomes after severe natural events, and what are the benefits? The following examples tell the story:<\/span><\/p>\n Move It, Or Lose It<\/b><\/p>\n Contractors can often harden infrastructure by moving equipment out of the floodplain. For instance, using a federal grant from the Economic Adjustment Assistance program, Portsmouth, Virginia garnered a $112 million benefit to its wastewater treatment plant by spending $11.6 million in construction. In effect, the city saved $9.70 for every dollar spent when it relocated the electrical equipment for its Lake Kirby water treatment plant. What contractors did was to move the equipment from one foot below the 100-year floodplain to eight feet above the 500-year floodplain.<\/span><\/p>\n Columbus Junction, Iowa went a step further. It relocated an entire water treatment plant using the same grant assistance as Portsmouth. Contractors moved the plant from two feet below the 100-year floodplain to two feet higher than the 500-year floodplain. The result was $5.9 million in benefit for $4.6 million spent.<\/span><\/p>\n Often, the indirect costs of having an infrastructure facility down are overlooked in infrastructure considerations. For example, unworking bathrooms force business closures or increase spending on mitigation measures like renting portable toilets. Residents without water for showers and toilets are often forced to relocate temporarily. <\/span><\/p>\n These hidden costs all add to the savings when you build infrastructure more sustainably. Those are additional savings your public clients can use to justify sustainable infrastructure projects. <\/span><\/p>\n Bridging Severe Weather<\/b><\/p>\n When it comes to roadways and bridges, elevation can produce a sizeable return on investment. The folks in Iowa City, Iowa used an Economic Adjustment Assistance program grant to raise a road and reconstruct a bridge. In this case, the city got a $456 million benefit for $40.5 million in construction. <\/span><\/p>\n In 2014, New York State<\/span> secured a FEMA grant<\/span><\/a> to strengthen 20 bridges that had been at risk of having their foundations washed out in severe weather. <\/span><\/p>\n